<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>The Hugo Awards &#187; In the News</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.thehugoawards.org/category/in-the-news/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.thehugoawards.org</link>
	<description>The Official Site of The Hugo Awards</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 12 Jul 2010 21:44:12 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
			<item>
		<title>Oscars Copy Hugos</title>
		<link>http://www.thehugoawards.org/2009/09/oscars-copy-hugos/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thehugoawards.org/2009/09/oscars-copy-hugos/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 01 Sep 2009 22:32:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[In the News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thehugoawards.org/?p=830</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The instant runoff voting system that the Hugo Awards use for their final ballot (often known as an Australian Ballot) has come in for a fair amount of criticism in its time. People complain that it is too complicated and they can&#8217;t understand it. However, we have stuck with it, because we believe that it [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The instant runoff voting system that the Hugo Awards use for their final ballot (often known as an Australian Ballot) has come in for a fair amount of criticism in its time. People complain that it is too complicated and they can&#8217;t understand it. However, we have stuck with it, because we believe that it produces better results. A certain other well known set of awards has always used a first past the post (plurality) system, but it was <a href="http://oscar-watch.ew.com/2009/08/31/academy-changes-best-picture-voting-rules/">announced recently</a> that from now, at least for Best Picture, on the Oscars will use an instant runoff system very similar to the one we use. Apparently the folks in charge of the Oscars think the change will produce better results (better here meaning fewer people yelling, &#8220;how come that won?&#8221;).</p>
<p>Tied in with this decision is the move to expand the nominee list for Best Picture to 10 films. Once you know that, the instant runoff system decision becomes obvious. With first past the post voting it is possible to win with a (1/N) + 1 share of the vote, where N is the number of nominees. With 5 nominees it was theoretically possible to win Best Picture with 21% of the vote; with 10 nominees you could win with 11%, so the chances of an upset win are much greater. The instant runoff system, however, will always produce a compromise winner that is least disliked by all voters.</p>
<p>There is just one problem for the Oscars. The members of the Motion Picture Academy are complaining that the new voting system is too complicated and they can&#8217;t understand it. Perhaps we could get some experienced Hugo voters to help them cast their votes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thehugoawards.org/2009/09/oscars-copy-hugos/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>7</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Thank You, Mr. Ross</title>
		<link>http://www.thehugoawards.org/2009/03/thank-you-mr-ross/</link>
		<comments>http://www.thehugoawards.org/2009/03/thank-you-mr-ross/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Mar 2009 14:22:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[In the News]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.thehugoawards.org/?p=239</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Twitter has been buzzing with talk about the Hugo Awards today. No, don&#8217;t worry, you haven&#8217;t missed the announcement of nominees, we don&#8217;t count that quickly. It is because Jonathan Ross tweeted this:
Why is it I love sci-fi but my wife is the one who wins a HUGO Award !!!!
Mr. Ross is well known for [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Twitter has been buzzing with talk about the Hugo Awards today. No, don&#8217;t worry, you haven&#8217;t missed the announcement of nominees, we don&#8217;t count that quickly. It is because <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jonathan_Ross">Jonathan Ross</a> tweeted this:</p>
<blockquote><p>Why is it I love sci-fi but my wife is the one who wins a HUGO Award !!!!</p></blockquote>
<p>Mr. Ross is well known for his love of science fiction and comics, and one enterprising twitterer managed to find <a href="http://twitpic.com/1rulh">this photograph</a>. However, that isn&#8217;t Mr. Ross&#8217;s Hugo, nor does it belong to his wife.</p>
<p>You can find Mrs. Ross, better known as <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jane_Goldman">Jane Goldman</a>, in our <a href="http://www.thehugoawards.org/?page_id=156">list of winners from 2008</a>. She was one of the screenwriters for the movie adaptation of Neil Gaiman&#8217;s <em>Stardust</em>. Her Hugo looks like this:</p>
<p><img src="http://www.thehugoawards.org/content/hugos-large/2008.jpg" alt="The 2008 Hugo Award" /></p>
<p><strong>Update</strong>: <a href="http://twitter.com/luke88addis">Luke Addiss</a> tells us that he made that photo of Ross with the 2007 Hugo using Photoshop. Very clever of him, and very quick too.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.thehugoawards.org/2009/03/thank-you-mr-ross/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
